Posts Tagged ‘President-neglect

19
Nov
16

The Era of Apprehension: The Trump Effect

The above music video conveys the feeling of all of the people who did not vote for Donald Trump. With all of the false campaign promises, the lies, the misogyny, the bigotry and the violent rhetoric, it is no wonder the the Trump Presidency will usher in “The Era of Apprehension.” There is some hope that it wouldn’t be as bad as all of that, after all, a lot of Americans are optimists. (Obviously, we are not all that optimistic or we wouldn’t have elected a candidate that felt that the United States of America  was the worst nation in the world).

So, would the not-Trump voters be happy if he does not destroy the world?

And would Trump supporters be happy if he did nothing and kept the process rigged?

Those are the questions: posed by the following article in the November 17,2016 edition of USA Today

 

Why It Might Not Matter if President Trump Keeps His Promises

Why It Might Not Matter if President Trump Keeps His Promises – USA Today

President-elect Donald Trump is backing off of some of his more dramatic campaign promises, but – and don’t breathe a word of this to George H.W. Bush – neither his supporters nor his opponents seem very upset.

Studies show that most presidential candidates have honored most of their campaign promises. Once elected, however, everyone compromises, backtracks or fudges to some extent.

For a variety reasons – including his supporters’ love of him, his opponents’ hatred of his proposals and a general acknowledgement that Trump is best taken seriously but not literally – this president may prove more immune than most to the political cost of broken promises.

John McGlennon teaches government at the College of William & Mary: “Both sides are willing to give him more flexibility than a conventional candidate would be allowed.’’

More, certainly, than the 41st president. Bush failed to win re-election in 1992 after campaigning in 1988 on a promise — “Read my lips: No new taxes!’’ – he later felt compelled to break.

Possibly because few major candidates have run for president with such drastic proposals, many Trump opponents are relieved that he apparently won’t try to do everything he said he’d do. And many Trump supporters say they never really expected him to do everything he said he’d do.

First, some Trump opponents.

“I prayed that he would have a change of heart, that he’d realize that some things he said he’d do he cannot do,’’ such as vaporize the Affordable Care Act, says Angelina Iles, a retired school employee who lives in Pineville, La., and voted for Hillary Clinton.

With that prayer seemingly answered, she has another: “That he’s backing off because he’s learned that the bullying attitude he had in the campaign won’t work once he’s in office.’’

After Trump passed 270 electoral votes on Election Night, David Bugh of Lancaster, Ohio, a pastor and small business owner, says he was afraid. But given signs of what he calls Trump’s “moderation,’’ says “I’m a little less pessimistic now.’’

Even a diehard Never-Trumper like Democrat Rich Langan of Ashwaubenon, Wis., a retired police officer, says he’s trying to keep an open mind: “I’ll give him six months.’’

As for the Trump supporters.

Despite some fiery campaign rhetoric, “once he’s in office he’ll soften up on pretty much everything,’’ says Barry Fixler, who last year opened his own local Trump headquarters in Bardonia, N.Y.

And that’s fine with Fixler, a jeweler. “In his heart, Trump loves people. He won’t do anything to drastically affect people,’’ such as non-criminal illegal immigrants. “He’s not going to throw out children (of illegal immigrants). He’s just going after the criminals and ISIS.’’

Many Trump voters say their man’s opponents were spooked by his campaign promises because they didn’t understand how he works.

Gene Dunn is a longtime Trump admirer who took his son out of school to attend Trump’s presidential campaign announcement at Trump Tower. Trump’s campaign promises were “standard The Art of the Deal practice,’’ he says, referring to Trump’s 1987 best seller. “Asking for the whole enchilada, but settling for what’s reasonable. And all sides can claim victory.’’

A. D. Amar, an Indian immigrant and business professor who lives in Warren, N.J., agrees that many of Trump’s campaign promises were really opening gambits: “That is Trump’s style as a negotiator. He throws the extreme negative outcome at his opponents. This brings them to the table, and then whatever they get after the negotiation is better than what Trump originally threw at them.’’

Here’s how President-elect Trump has been rewriting candidate Trump:

  • Some elements of the Affordable Care Act, which he’d promised to repeal and replace, are worth keeping. He cited provisions requiring coverage of pre-existing medical conditions and allowing children to remain on parents’ plans until they turn 26. “I like those very much,” Trump told The Wall Street Journal.
  • Some illegal immigrants are “terrific people,” and his priorities are 1) securing the border and 2) deporting criminals. The number of all illegal immigrants is around 11 million; criminals in that group number anywhere between 800,000 and several million.
  • Some sections of the “big beautiful wall’’ he’s vowed to build along the border might actually look more like fencing.

If and when Americans try to pin candidate Trump’s promises to President Trump, they will have their work cut out for them, says John Baick, who teaches American political history at Western New England University in Springfield, Mass.

One problem is sheer volume – the “many, many promises made on the campaign trail,’’ says Baick. “There is almost certainly no candidate who has produced more verbiage, in person and in digital form, than Donald Trump.’’

Another is the lack of specifics. Trump, Baick says, “can claim that he has kept many simply by taking symbolic steps.’’ For instance, it may be enough if Trump starts to build the wall, just as John F. Kennedy gets credit for starting a man-on-the-moon program that was not scheduled for completion until after what would have been his second term.

In defeating the GOP establishment in the primaries and Clinton in the general election, Trump may already have kept his biggest, most emotional promise to supporters, McGlennon says: “As long as they feel he’ll bring an end to business as usual in Washington, they’ll worry about the details later on.’’

But there will be a later on.

McGlennon says that while there’s merit to the idea that Trump spoke to his supporters in ways that should not be taken literally, “The question is how long the public will be satisfied with that. At some point people want specifics. Is Trump disciplined enough to provide them?’’


———————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Editor’s Note

Actually the USA Today article was a puff piece will no real insightful value. But it does bring up the discussion that is truly meaningful.

Can Somebody with Such Low Expectations Be Successful?

Let us start with the crux of the article: can somebody with such low expectations, be successful, just because they started out with such low expectations? The USA Today article suggests yes. But let us further dissect this. For Trump supporters, they feel that the promises were false to begin with. That they were happy just to find somebody who felt their anger. What were the Trump supporters angry about? You name it, they were angry about it, logical or not, they were angry. They were angry because they had been whipped up into a frenzy for the past eight years by their favorite media outlets. (It will be interesting to see, with a Republican President and Republican Congress, if the Angry White Man Network becomes the Kumbaya Channel or the Network of Apologists).

So, if Trump does not do anything about the Free Trade Deals and he brings no jobs back to America, the Trump supports will not care. If the corporations take a higher percentage of profits and the middle class further sinks into the poverty levels, the Trump supporters will not care (they have been supporting that plan since 1980). If the system is even more rigged and the USA enters more wars, the Trump supporters will not care. If the economy goes into recession, they will say it was Obama’s fault. The Trump supporters will be happy that their favorite born-millionaire and “champion of the working-class people” won the election. It does not matter if he sucks at the office. His supporters will stay by him. That is plain and simple. Even if Trump gets impeached for treason in the next six months, he will always be popular with his supporters. Nothing can tarnish him (from that side).

Will Non-Trump Voters Be Happy That He Doesn’t Destroy the World?

How about from the other side -the non-Trump voters and critics? Will they be happy just for the simple reason he does not destroy the country? The answer is no. Yes, they will be relieved, but they won’t be happy. They live with this belief: Every day is a possible day that an idiot could destroy the world or part of the world, or parts of society or collapsing of economies. So, would the Non Trump voters be happy that that Trump does not do all those things? Again, NO! Just relieved. How about some specific issue that non-Trump voters care about? Would non-Trump voters be happy if Trump does not dismantle The Affordable Care Act? No, but they would be relieved. You don’t get credit for doing nothing (or for threatening to do something bad and then not do it.)

How about anything positive? The only measure that I can see in the foreseeable future that would make Non-Trump voters not hate Trump would be to pass an Obama-like Infrastructure Spending bill of 2009. Remember, the GOP stopped other stimulus/infrastructure bills in 2010,2011,2012, 2013,2014, etc. So, we shall see if the President-neglect can pass a “non-GOP” bill. (Funny, the GOP always used to fund infrastructure bills, but that was until the election of President Barack Obama, who also passed the GOP sponsored health care bill – which ultimately was re-named The Affordable Care Act). My feeling is that the non-Trump voters will see Trump like they did George W. Bush. They were both clowns, doing bad wherever they went, although this new clown wears make-up 24 hours a day. The final answer to USA TODAY – no, the non-Trump voters will not be happy. And the Trump supporters will be happy even if he brings on “The End Of The World.”




April 2017
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Categories


%d bloggers like this: